Archive for the climate treaty Category

Propaganda and Culture Wars: Climategate and the death of science

Posted in cass sunstein, climate treaty, Coca Cola Hopenhagen, Environmental movement, eugenics, global climate treaty, global warming hoax, health czar, rationed health care, right to life on December 4, 2009 by AN Security

Global warming is a hoax. Is that a surprise?

I read Sarah Palin’s commentary on Facebook today calling for Mr. Obama to boycott the climate conference in Copenhagen. As much as I admire Mrs. Palin, I have to disagree with one thing; as I posted on her page, Obama won’t investigate his ‘climate’ experts because they are part of the shadow government he wants to implement, that’s why. He can’t investigate people he’s counting on to push the environmentalist agenda bent on giving away our sovereignty to our enemies. Every day the federal government makes some stupid claim that human-made pollution is destroying the world and is taking steps to take over our ability to make choices and make our great nation the culprit of the world’s ills. There is no point in asking Obama to chastise the same people he counts on to help him accomplish his hope and change. He also has a strong backing in the Congress.

Global warming pseudo science has been the big lie to keep people from asking questions. Now that it’s out in the open idiots like Barbara Boxer say it’s a crime to reveal the emails because they were stolen. Really? How about the crime of usurping power from the American people? What about justice? Now truth and justice are considered crimes by the liberals and it makes sense. They are uncomfortable with the truth and they hang on to their make-believe world until the rest of us believe it.

Obama said clearly for two years of sitting on the senate bench voting present he wanted to ‘transform’ America and this message was delivered to the masses loud and clear during the campaign. That was not some cryptic speech, it was in plain English. Those of us who understood it then are praying now asking why this man was elected to office. This is indeed a transformation I want no part of and many Americans agree.

This tyranny must be stopped. We must question everything from now on even at great risk to our wellbeing because of a lie. Global warming…I was in Baghdad when it snowed…boy was that a typical global warming experience!

And as for science, the next time a relative gets sick with some rare disease say goodbye to conventional wisdom, seek other answers and challenge all research. There is no information we can trust now. The next time ladies, you go to the gynecologist for a check remember someone has declared breast exams and mammograms necessary only for women within a certain age group and that’s not you guess what? Good luck. Obama’s Czar Cass Sunstein and Rahm Emanuel’s brother Ezekiel Rahm, a ‘bioethicist’ and Obama’s choice for ‘health’ Czar have that very concept in mind for you. This is the guy who thinks that Eugenics – which by the way is NOT a rock band – is the most ethical way of dealing with life and death of humans. Rahm believes people who don’t fit a certain criteria, should not receive health care. But that’s just a glib description of the guy. You can read what he thinks here, a paper entitled Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions you tell me…these people think that you and me are bad for the environment. These are the same people who vilified the medical profession accusing doctors of cutting off limbs and doing unnecessary surgery to make a buck are out to get you and their scheme is finally made public but they’re fighting hard to do damage control.

Oh, but don’t let me limit your answers to that; how about all the money dumped into worthless and frivolous research like the NIH (National Institutes of Health) on Chinese hookers? It’s obvious that hookers in China need instruction on how not to drink too much on the job. In the meantime people die from disease all over the world.  It’s not looking good for science right now. Maybe we can study the impact the Chinese hookers could have if we send them to the moon. Even NASA has come under scrutiny. So much for stargazing.

For so long I defended the need to support even pure research because many good discoveries came from both design or from secondary results; many an accident in the lab has become an invention or treatment for disease to help humanity; always a welcomed outcome. Not anymore. Science has become yet another tool to manipulate our freedom to think for ourselves and those scientists who support this ideal are guilty of crimes against humanity. The reputation and relevance of scientific work, for those who actually do it to help humanity, has been tarnished and personal and professional greed has driven ‘scientists’ to support a hoax because their objective is to see who gets to be lauded as the best of whatever in academia. I for one don’t care. And for those scientists who had the courage to speak out but where drowned out by the mobsters I feel for you; you are the minority and losing the battle. The profession has lost credibility.

And so has its main spokesman – well, I never thought he had credibility – but Al Gore just cancelled his grip-and-grin appearance 

 in Copenhagen. That’s too bad because he’s probably afraid he’ll be confronted by people like Irish reporter Phelim McAleer as he questioned the validity of Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth and may have to actually answer why he thinks polar bears are so endangered when clearly it’s humanity these commies are trying to destroy. Not only that, Gore continues to fill his pockets with money from ventures that go against his supposed environmental philosophy but doesn’t want you or me to grow prosperous.

So you know what? I’ve had it with this bad science. When someone tells me I eat too much of anything or that I create too much trash I’m going to do the exact opposite. That’s right. You know what I’m having for breakfast this morning?

Pork rinds, grape juice and bread and as soon as I stop typing this I’m going to get me the biggest cup of coffee – regular, no decaf – I can find and chug the whole thing. Why? Because I want to and this is my life and having choices is truly happiness. This is called freedom and it tastes good! Take that, worshipers of world dominance. The gig is up.

More on Obama’s climate experts and other links:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=117804

Media being banned from the conference

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=117858

Earth warming

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=117823

Hackers vs climate hoax

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/70249-boxer-hacked-climategate-emails-may-face-criminal-probe

The Zealous Sell-outs

Posted in 9/11 trial, climate treaty, eric holder, Opinion (Political) on November 22, 2009 by AN Security

No wonder Obama is stalling on joining his world-government buddies on this climate treaty next month. Holder and Obama, I’ll call them the Feasance Brothers, are sure eager to get this show on the road, don’t they?

Obama doesn’t need the other countries to sell out our sovereignty. Sorry to challenge Lord Monckton’s claim that the climate treaty will bring about the loss of our civil liberties to a global government. I think that the 9/11 trial will cause enough distraction over time to keep people from realizing that is happening. Maybe I’m paranoid, maybe I’m not but I do know that with such a scatter-brained move like this trial there must be some sort of profit to be made. Of course profit won’t be for the American people.

We let the European buffoons come to our country to engage in the same functions the U.S. and the rest of the world did after WWII. Does anyone remember the Nuremberg trials? That was different and the U.S. was not under scrutiny for committing crimes against humanity. That was the purpose for creating a ‘global’ criminal court – the International Criminal Court – so that countries could keep tabs on hostilities committed by other states. This was not a court designed to watch over individual cases within each country. This ‘court’ has been increasingly getting involved in the internal affairs on countries when it comes to applying punishment for capital crimes and treats that in the same category as war crimes. The ICC does not yet have jurisdiction over individuals unless they are accused of war crimes then they can be forced to go before the court whether their country of origin is a signatory or not. These global watchdogs are created out of fear that countries won’t attack each other and do it inhumanely. Russia comes to mind; they invaded Georgia and have not been punished to my knowledge. Where are the high-profile trials? They waged a war with a small country with the lame excuse that Russian citizens were in those areas and were in danger. So a rescue mission, right? Wow. The U.S. should have tried that! They keep practicing the same deadly expansionist strategies that served them so well the Afghanistan invasion which finally taught them a lesson. Still, I don’t see the ICC going after them as readily as they do the U.S. What a racket.

This opens the door for the continuation of the utopian world society the Europeans want to build. They don’t get along on their own turf and they are insanely jealous of our way of life. Now something that really irks me is Germany’s newly-acquired moral compass which has been trained on our civil judicial system, to observe, to measure, to judge. Somebody tell me just why the U.S. government has any obligation to allow these observers to enter the country in the first place. Stand outside the plane at the airport and point back at the airplane and have them turn around and go home. It’s a glib course of action but effective. Tell the world we handle our own business, thank you!

I would be hard-pressed to believe that this German Justice Ministry wanting to oversee our judicial system has had any education in these proceedings. Perhaps a tour of this place

The Holocaust Museum

will be beneficial in shifting scrutiny and re-focus its objectives. Let’s not worry about the U.S. handing down a death penalty sentence for a capital crime…no, wait. Are they mainstream criminals or enemy combatants? I mean, Obama said during the campaign he didn’t believe we should afford them Miranda Warnings in Afghanistan, now we’re trying them in the U.S.

You see, this is exactly how we will eventually relinquish our freedoms to the stinking liberal world. A real president would have followed Roosevelt’s leadership during war in dealing with domestic terrorism and tried these guys in a military tribunal instead. But no, we want to give these animals due process. Why?

Justice has been delayed…

Eric Holder has trouble figuring out why we’re prosecuting the 9/11 terrorists. He said recently, at the prospect of bringing the animals to already traumatized New Yorkers to be tried, that justice had been delayed. Really? Here’s a clue:

3,000 U.S. citizens murdered in one day

We went to war with countries which harbored and continue to harbor terrorists

We’re still fighting them

Justice has not been delayed Mr. Holder. Justice continues to be served; that is why we went to war. The U.S. was attacked and we are defending ourselves; that is our right. You don’t need to make these trials, lengthy and expensive to the tax payers just for show. Our armed forces have been doing that every day for the past eight years. If you wanted justice you’d allow the military judicial system to swiftly handle each defendant – and by the way, those guys have confessed and are ready to receive their punishment – then you can go ahead and talk about doing justice. I’m not at all convinced this trial is about anything but to sell-out. It is yet another way to usurp power over our lives, unleash unknown threats to our national security, encouraging our enemies to fight us within the parameters set by our Constitution and sit back and wait for ‘justice’ to treat them right. I think we need to have justice done by removing Eric Holder from office and shutting the door to foreign judicial inspectors from running our lives.

Germany concerned its evidence to be used to back death penalty in 9/11 trial

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/21/germany-concerned-evidence-used-death-penalty-trial/

This is a great commentary by Charles Krauthammer, Travesty in New York

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZjAxZWY3OWMyY2ZkMmE5NzI3ZGFmYmI2NWNjZDQ3ZDc=